Mich. v. Michael Jackson-Bolanos

DETROIT, Mich. – The trial of Mich. V. Michael Jackson-Bolanos, charged with the murder of Samantha Woll, began on June 11, 2024 with opening statements. The state laid out a lot of evidence in their opening statement, but the defense gave the jury a lot to think about.

Everyone Can Agree on This

Samantha Woll, a prominent member of her community, was found by a neighbor outside on her lawn, at 6:21 a.m. on October 21, 2023. Her body bloody, barefoot, and cold to the touch. A trail of blood lead from her body to her home, revealing a bloody scene. There was blood smeared on the walls and on the floor.  The Cause of death revealed at the autopsy was from eight stab wounds above the shoulders, focusing on Woll’s head and neck. This both state and defense agree on during their opening statements.

The State’s Opening Statement

“There is a reason we lock our doors at night when we go to sleep. It is because people who lurk in the night; people who could do us harm, and this case is about one such person,” the state begins their opening statement. “A person you will see on one particular night on the prowl in our community, looking for spaces that were not his to go into and things that were not his to take. The most important thing he ended up taking in that night was the life of a woman. A woman named Samantha Woll.”  

The state continues their opening with a tale of a fun night for Woll, a night spent at a wedding and returning home around 12:30 a.m. Her last outgoing text a “heart” emoji sent to a friend at 1:02 a.m. and appearing to go to bed sometime around 1:24 a.m. when her living room motion detector goes idle and the last activity on her phone between 1:29 a.m. and 1:35 a.m.

Something Woll may not have known, according to her front door sensor, it would appear that the door never closed after she returned home. A small mistake many have made in their time but, in this case, would lead to a tragic ending.

A picture of a thorough investigation by the homicide task force, which consists of the Detroit Police, Michigan State Police, ATF, and FBI. The investigation started open-ended and would take 6 weeks to narrow down. At which point, they had two suspects. Suspect 1 was an ex-boyfriend of Molly’s. Suspect 2, the defendant.

The ex-boyfriend spoke to police, willingly, the day after Woll was found dead. Then, on November 7, 2023, he called police during what is being described as a delusional panic attack. After an increased dosage in his depression meds and ingesting cannabis, he was convinced himself that he had killed Woll himself. This despite having no proof or memory of committing the act. No DNA or fingerprints belonging to the ex-boyfriend were found at the scene. Using cell phone data, investigators put him home on the night of her death.

Suspect 2 was a figure seen on camera footage from an elementary school near Woll’s building that picked up a figure in a nearby parking lot, tampering with cars. One of the cars had a slashed tire. This caught the attention of investigators and they looked for other cameras in the area. Able to track the figures motions, the FBI worked with T-Mobile to find devices following the trajectory. They were able it down to the defendant, Michael Jackson-Bolanos.

Jackson-Bolanos left his girlfriend’s home at 12:32 a.m. in Midtown Detroit the night of Woll’s death. At 1:44 a.m. he is in the location of the Lafayette Park neighborhood near Woll’s home. There he stayed about 18 minutes. He returned to his girlfriend’s home at 4:55 a.m. During the time he was out, he was wearing a North Face Jacket and a white backpack.

On November 30, 2023, the defendant was arrested and a search warrant for his girlfriend’s apartment was executed. During the search, officers found the North Face jacket worn on the night in question, with 2 spots of blood. After testing and comparing the DNA to Woll’s, it was concluded to a high probability that the DNA matched. During a search of the defendant’s car, the white backpack was also found. That too had blood on it that came back as a high probability match to the DNA of Woll. Jackson-Bolanos was unable to give an explanation for the blood found on the backpack and jacket.

The Defense’s Opening Statements

“It was not Michael Jackson-Bolanos,” defense said as they started their opening. “She was stabbed 8 times in the neck and back. That would indicate a crime of passion.” He went on to describe the scene and events of that night.

There were bruises and contusions on her face, evidence of a struggle in multiple rooms. There was a high concentration of blood in the hallway. This is indicative of a body having fallen and lying there for a period of time. All of this effort, and nothing of value was taken from the home.

The defendant admits to being in the area that night. He also told police of his having come upon the body and touching her to see if she was still alive. Would this not be a possible explanation for the spots of blood found on the jacket and backpack? The neighbor who found Woll lying outside touched the body to see if she was alive. If the investigators had collected his clothing and done a blood analysis, would they have found trace amounts of blood on him as well?

There were no footprints found in the blood from the defendant to indicate that he had walked around the scene. Given the bloody scene, wouldn’t “he have been covered in blood?” He made no attempt to discard any of the clothes he had worn that night. Yes, his girlfriend had washed the North Face jacket, but she washed it with a load of laundry as she would any other garment.

Yes, they found multiple knives both in the girlfriend’s home, and on the defendant himself, but they were all sent for analysis. None of the knives returned with evidence associating the defendant with the scene. The “only evidence” the state has connecting Jackson-Bolanos to the scene are trace spots of blood on the back of his sleeve. There was no blood on either his pants or his shoes.

Despite his body being photographed at the time of arrest, no signs of having been in a fight or struggle were visible. He made no attempt to avoid law enforcement. In fact, he contacted law enforcement himself several times in an attempt to find out when he could get his knives back.

The ex-boyfriend on the other hand, had already secured an attorney through his parents after he told them what he had done; a story, according to defense opening, he changed after speaking with his therapist. He had a camera system in his house, but law enforcement was unable to extract pictures from his camera due to either having been deleted or some other explanation. As for the cell phone placing him at home, his only alibi, would he have been smart enough to not have brought the phone with him to the scene?

This One’s for You to Decide

At first glance, this appears to be an open and closed case. That is, until the defense offered their opening statement. The statement started a little rocky, but quickly picked up and, in my opinion, was enough to make people stop and think. But that’s not for me to decide for you.

One tragic night. One murder victim. Two Suspects. One defendant, Michael Jackson-Bolanos. Is he guilty of murder or being in the wrong place at the wrong time?

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Guilty of Murder or Wrong Place, Wrong Time? appeared first on .

In response to the state’s demand for an alibi, defense released the following on April 17, 2024.

“Mr. Kohberger was out driving in the early morning hours of November 13, 2022; as he
often did to hike and run and/or see the moon and stars. He drove throughout the area south of
Pullman, Washington, west of Moscow, Idaho including Wawawai Park.”

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Defense Releases Alibi in Kohberger Case appeared first on .

OXFORD, Mi. – Represented by Attorney Marielle Lehman, James Crumbley appeared in court yesterday after a motion was filed to excluded three of the witnesses the prosecution plans to call.

Prosecution plans to call two former Oxford High School students to testify about what they witnessed in the hallway during the shooting on November 30, 2021. Prosecution argued that the students give a unique perspective given that they are the only two surviving shooting victims from the hallway. Defense argued the testimony is irrelevant; the only purpose being to “inflame the jury” and would be “highly prejudicial.” Prosecution also plans to call the former owner of the gun used in the shooting.

Judge Cheryl Matthews said that while she previously was against the testimony of the former gun owner, she now feels that he “may have information on the condition of the cable lock” and will allow the testimony. Matthews is taking more time to decide whether to allow the testimony of the two former students.

James Crumbley is charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter related to the shooting at Oxford High School by his son, Ethan Crumbley, who is currently serving a sentence of life in prison. His wife, Jennifer Crumbley, was found guilty last month of four counts of manslaughter. Crumbley’s trial is set to begin on March 5.

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Pre-trial Motion for James Crumbley, Father of Oxford High School Shooter appeared first on .

PALM BEACH, Fl – After being found guilty of aggravated child abuse, false imprisonment, and neglect of a child, Timothy Ferriter was sentenced on November 16, 2023.

Judge Howard J. Coates, Jr. listened to hours of testimony both in favor of and against Ferriter, and arguments made by both the defense attorney and prosecution. Among the testimony, there was the victim, the defendant’s adopted son Ronan Ferriter, and his eldest child, Fiona Ferriter. Both children spoke on behalf of the state.

Fiona Ferriter described her father as, “a stone statue of a parent.” She talked about the affect the abuse on her younger brother had on her and her other siblings, along with the fear they lived in not knowing when, or if, their father would turn on them.

Ronan Ferriter spoke mostly of love and forgiveness. “I came here today to see your face again. It may be the last, so let’s make this right,” he began as he addressed the defendant, his father, and the court. He went on to speak of the good he seen in his father. “I still love you, and I always will love you, until the end of my days…I just wish you the best. I want to say I will always love you until the end of my days. I just with you the best. I want to say you were everything I needed all along. I want you to be happy whether it is with me or not.”

He then addressed the court in asking for the judge to not go too harsh on his father. “My father was a good person; he just made a very big mistake. Judge Coates, I wish you could sentence my father to 6 months jail time, and 5 years probation.”

The defendant addressed the court as well. He apologized to his children that they have “had to go through this.” He went on to speak of his Catholic faith and how things are done for the benefit of the children. “Everything I have [done] was out of love.” Missing from his address was an acceptance of his actions and them being wrong. He showed no remorse or apology for what he had done, something the judge would later point out.

After listening to all the arguments, evidence, and testimony, the judge ultimately sentenced Ferriter to 60 months, with 37 days credit time, incarceration at the state prison for all three charges, to run concurrent, 5 years of probation on the first charge. He is to have no contact with the 3 older children until age of majority, after which the children may choose to have contact with the defendant. Ferriter is to have 40 hours of anger management course and 40 hours of parenting course. Any contact the youngest child is to be supervised with adoptive mother and is to have no part of the discipline of the child.

Ferriter is to have no contact with any of the children until all probation conditions have been completed. Ferriter is to go through a mental health evaluation and treatment and be fitted with a monitor prior to release from the department of corrections. As a condition of probation, he is charged with costs totally $1,900.

Judge Howard Coates, Jr. granted a motion to hold the defendant in custody of Palm Beach Sherriff’s Office until a hearing on appellate bond can be held.

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Timothy Ferriter Sentenced in Child Abuse Case appeared first on .

COLORADO SPRINGS, Co – “Al Stauch, Gannon’s father, capital F-a-t-h-e-r” is how the victim impact statement began after all others had their say. He then read a few words from his new wife, Melissa, before reading a poem. The poem is titled Invictus and written by William Ernest Henley. It’s the same poem he quoted at Gannon’s memorial in Colorado Springs in August 2020. Below is those words Gannon’s Father shared “to say [he] alone controls [his] actions and reactions.”

Invictus by William Ernest Henley

Out of the night that covers me,   
  Black as the Pit from pole to pole,   
I thank whatever gods may be   
  For my unconquerable soul.   

In the fell clutch of circumstance 
  I have not winced nor cried aloud.   
Under the bludgeonings of chance   
  My head is bloody, but unbowed.   

Beyond this place of wrath and tears   
  Looms but the Horror of the shade, 
And yet the menace of the years   
  Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.   

It matters not how strait the gate,   
  How charged with punishments the scroll,   
I am the master of my fate:
  I am the captain of my soul.

A Father’s Words to the Court

“Gannon was born severely premature and barely filled my two hands the first time I held him. At the end of his life, after his bad was cremated into a pile of ashes he was ultimately no bigger than the first time I held him.” This is the image Gannon’s Father begins his speech with, that of an 11-year-old boy being reduced to nothing more than a tiny pile of ash.

For those who followed the trial, they are aware that the prosecution began their case in chief with 2 days of testimony from Stauch. Trial watchers heard the steps taken by Stauch from the moment he learned of Gannon’s disappearance. Watchers heard hours of recorded phone calls between Stauch and his son’s murderer.

This testimony not only opened the trial with high emotions, it went a long way to show not only the lengths a father will got to bring home his son, but to also ease any doubt of Stauch’s innocence in the death of his son anyone may have been harboring. Stauch addressed these doubts in open court. “I’ve been questioned, compared to my abusive father, and ridiculed for my approach to finding Gannon,” Stauch said. “I hope now that the world has seen that I was assigned the most arduous task of finding Gannon in the only place possible for him to have been, in the mind of a killer. Were my efforts fruitful? I believe so. But, from the moment I did not see the Volkswagon Tiguan at French Elementary on that Tuesday evening, a clear direction for finding Gannon pointed directly and precisely at [Letecia]…It was only by the grace of God that Gannon’s precious body was finally found.”

Just feet from the woman Stauch once married, the woman who murdered his son, what words does he have from her. Stauch spoke of Gannon’s last words and asks what they were. Stauch spoke of the woman she once was, a “beautiful, extremely intelligent woman.” He addressed the woman she became, a “murderous, narcissistic, and arrogantly flippant human being.” But it’s the simple question of a parent that stands out. “Why couldn’t you just let him be a momma’s boy? That’s all he wanted to be. He just loved his momma.”

A Father’s Words to His Son

Before he finished addressing the court, Stauch took a moment to address Gannon. “Gannon,” he said through tears, “I never in my wildest dream ever thought you’d be in danger buddy, o I would not have left you at home with what turned out to be your murderer and the last person to ever see you on this earth.”

Directly to the court, Gannon’s Father directs his final words, “From a proud and broken father, from the bottom of my heart, I thank you.”

More From the Sentencing of Letecia Stauch

The Judge Gets the Final Word: The Sentencing of Letecia Stauch

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Gannon’s Father Opens with A Poem appeared first on .

COLORADO SPRINGS, Co. – After 20 days of trial and approximately 8 hours of deliberations, the jury in the trial of Letecia Stauch trial came back with a verdict. Stauch was found guilty on all 4 counts, the most serious being first-degree murder and murder of a child under 12 by a person in a position of trust.

Both the prosecution and defense in agreeance, it was decided sentencing would be immediate. Judge Werner excused himself for a half hour to address the jury before returning to the courtroom where we heard victim impact statements. Victim statements were followed by the final words before sentencing was handed down. Those words belonged to a visually emotional Judge Gregory R. Werner.

The Betrayal

“Ms. Stauch, you betrayed the person you loved enough to marry. You told your husband lies and took away someone he loved. You took away every day that Mr. Stauch or Ms. Hubbard could have had with their son. When you take a life, regardless of how you do that, you forever alter the future. Neither Mr. Stauch or Ms. Bullard will ever see their son graduate from high school, go through the joy and the pain of that first love, or get married. They will never know what impact their son would have had on the world had he lived to become an adult. And, had Gannon’s body not been found they never would have known what happened to Gannon.”

The Motive

As Werner continued, he hit the different aspects of Stauch’s case. A key point in the defense’s closing was the lack of motive. In a trial, it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove motive, but most people have come to expect one. “Claiming a lack of motive is a common defense tactic, and it can be a sound strategy” Werner said. “The truth is, however, that it only takes a moment to make a bad decision that results in disastrous consequences. An 11-year-old boy with burns who feels that he’s not being take care of…it is not hard to imagine Gannon saying something like, ‘You’re not my mom. I want my mom. I want my dad.’ And that would be enough to make you really angry, but anger is not an excuse.”

Anger is a common reason behind many acts of violence. So is jealousy, hatred and resentment. This case seems to have all of the above. Werner expressed this when he said to Stauch, “It’s clear that you hated and was jealous of Landon Bullard. You saw yourself as a better mother than she was.  It’s clear you had some resentment from being left with Mr. Stauch’s children…It’s clear you felt trapped. You wanted out…I can imagine you saw your whole future consisting of taking care of Mr. Stauch’s children and that is not the future you wanted. You took all of that out on Gannon.”

The Lies

Then there are the lies. There were too many to count. Stauch told “lie upon lie, but [she] slipped up at various points and let kernels of truth escape” and that, according to Werner, played a big part in her getting caught. But what did all of those lies have in common? In all of the versions of the truth she told, she was “always the victim…in all of them, [she] could claim it wasn’t [her] fault.”

The Sentence

After Werner put into words what so many were thinking, the time came to address the final piece of the trial process, sentencing. “One of the purposes is to impose an appropriate sentence for the criminal conduct that occurred. Another purpose is to punish an offender by imposing a sentence that take into account the seriousness of the offense. Yet another purpose of sentencing is to prevent crime and promote respect for the law.”

“This is not the first murder case that has come before me,” Werner says, directing his words to Stauch. “This is not the first case I’ve presided over which involves harm to a child…I have had a number of cases which have demonstrated one person’s capacity for cruelty. I can say, without hesitation, that the facts of this case are the most horrific I have ever seen. You’re conduct in this case deserves the maximum punishment that I can impose under Colorado law.”

With those closing words, Werner sentenced Stauch to 2 life sentences without the possibility of parole for the charges of first-degree murder and murder of a child under 12 by a person of trust. In addition, she received 12 years for the charge of tampering with a deceased human body and 18 months for tampering with physical evidence.

More Articles on the Trial of Colorado vs. Letecia Stauch

Trial to Start for Letecia Stauch, Woman Charged with Killing Her Stepson

State’s Exhibit #35, The Phone Call

Father of Murdered Child Testifies

Internet Searches Give Jury A Look into Defendant’s State of Mind

The Defense’s Case, A Win for The State?

Be sure to follow on Facebook for more up to the minute information:

Truth and Deliberation | Facebook

TruthAndDeliberation (@TrthDelibration) / Twitter

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post The Judge Gets the Final Word: The Sentencing of Letecia Stauch appeared first on .

COLORADO SPRINGS, Co. –  After the state’s 17-day presentation of their case in chief, the defense got their chance to present witnesses. The list of witnesses consisted of two experts, Drs. Ronda Niederhauser and Dorothy Lewis.

Defense Witness #1: Dr. Ronda Niederhauser

The first to take the stand was Dr. Niederhauser. The testimony of Niederhauser was short and straight forward. Niederhauser met with Letecia Stauch twice, December 5 and 13, 2019. The first visit was prompted during an appointment between Stauch and her primary care physician. Stauch was having stress and anxiety related to harassment at her current job. Stauch was diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and recommended that she get a prescription for hydroxyzine to help with sleep and anxiety, and see a therapist.

During the follow-up appointment with Niederhauser, it was discussed that Stauch decided to quit her current job for another, and Niederhauser reported that the symptoms of anxiety had begun to lessen. Niederhauser provided a letter to Stauch’s employer to relieve her of her contract on medical grounds. There were no more appointments between Niederhauser and Stauch.

The state went further into Stauch’s symptoms and Niederhauser’s impressions of her mental state during the cross-examination. Stauch self-reported trouble sleeping and moderate anxiety but denied suicidal or homicidal ideation and Niederhauser had no concerns that she was a danger either to herself or others. Stauch was also found to not have any signs of severe mental disorders.

Defense Witness #2: Dr. Dorothy Lewis

After a delay in proceedings by the tardiness of Dr. Lewis, the defense presented their second witness. Lewis interviewed Stauch for a total of 14 hours in November 2022. Stauch’s defense attorney, Josh Tolini, was in the room at the time of the interviews. Defense entered into evidence the videos of the interviews for the jury to view but did not present them in the court room.

Defense begins by having Lewis define dissociative identity disorder (“D.I.D.”). Lewis sees D.I.D. as a type of “self-hypnosis” caused by early, ongoing physical or sexual abuse that can no longer be coped with. The alter, according to Lewis, “takes on characteristics of the abuser.” During cross-examination, Lewis is asked whether Stauch turned into her alleged abuser, James. Lewis responds with the same question. No altar named James is ever revealed. Lewis does, however, speak of an altar named Maria she describes as “harsh, angry, [and] hurtful.”

Testimony moves to the events leading up to the death of the victim, Gannon Stauch. On this topic, Lewis is unclear about what Stauch told her versus what she read. Lewis testifies to Stauch telling “numerous” and “mindless” stories which Lewis cannot think straight. “She makes up the darndest stories,” Lewis says, “I don’t think she knows what happened.” Claiming that at the time Stauch tells the stories Stauch doesn’t believe them.

Lewis found that Stauch has “many of the signs, symptoms, and behaviors of dissociative identity disorder” but does not give specifics. “About the time Gannon was killed, she was psychotic at the time…I don’t think she knew what she was doing.”

Dr. Lewis, The Cross-Examination

After defense’s direct of Lewis, she was cross-examined by Prosecutor Dave Young. The 2-day cross-examination opens with questioning Lewis on whether she looked at the Colorado statute regarding sanity before rendering an opinion. Lewis responds, “I did but I’d have to refresh myself” and is unable to give the Colorado law she used to render her opinion, asking Young to read her the law before she can say.

The next topic of concern is the EEG Lewis claims would have helped with her more fully render her opinion. “Do you recall being asked to testify why you wanted and EEG done,” asked Young. To which Lewis responded, “I do not know what you’re talking about…It was my understanding that the court had refused the funding.” The request for an EEG and MRI was withdrawn by defense on October 3, 2022 after receiving an e-mail, introduced by prosecution, from Lewis giving them the go ahead to withdraw the request.

The first time Lewis spoke with Tolini was in February 2022, after which Stauch changed her plea to not guilty by reason of insanity. Lewis testified to assuming when she recommended this change of plea. She had not reviewed anything on the case at the time she made the recommendation.

Lewis claims to insist that there have been evidence pointing to D.I.D. long before she comes on the case. This evidence in large part comes from those who know the subject to be evaluated as they can testify to changes. Lewis did not speak to any family of friends of Stauch. Lewis “asked the attorney with who [she] could speak, and [she] was not put in touch with any of these people, so [she] didn’t use them.”

“Why didn’t you refuse to testify because you didn’t have done what you wanted to have done,” Young asks. To which, Lewis responds, “I don’t know. I probably should have.”

“Did the thought ever cross your mind that [Stauch] could be faking it,” Young asks. “No, it did not occur to me,” Lewis responds.

The State Questions Lewis on The Day Gannon Died

The answers to questions about the day Gannon was killed did not have solid answers. Stauch texted her boss during the early morning of January 27, 2020, claiming that her stepfather was killed crossing the road and she wouldn’t be able to work. Stauch’s stepfather was killed in 2004. To this, Lewis says Stauch “clearly was not thinking clearly or accurately. It’s one of those excuses a person of her intellect would not be expected to volunteer. You would almost say there’s a stupidity about it but she isn’t stupid.”

“Could it be she just didn’t want to go to work that day,” Young asks.

“Unlikely, but possibly,” Lewis responds.

Stauch called into Gannon’s school that same morning informing them he would not be in that day. “Nothing psychotic about that,” asks Young.

“At the time I read that, and became aware of it, I was puzzled because I thought, gee, he must have been dead then…it really did not make sense to me,” Lewis responds. “Gannon couldn’t go to school, but I learned, subsequently, that he is reportedly dead a lot later than that so it’s a puzzle why she called in to say he couldn’t come in.”

Young then digs deeper into Lewis’s thought on Stauch’s mental state on this day, asking Lewis if Stauch has the capacity to know right from wrong. “I don’t know,” Lewis says. “That’s a leap if you can’t talk to the person. I don’t know.”

I Don’t Know, and I Can’t Say

Is she legally insane at the time,” Young asks.

“I don’t know. I would have to know a whole lot more,” Lewis responds.

“If you don’t know a lot more, can you come in here and say that she was legally insane at the time she went to Petco?”

“I can’t say, because I don’t know enough about it.”

“Did she have the capacity to know right from wrong?”

“I don’t know that.”

“Based on the stab wounds alone, did the person doing that have the capacity to form the intent to kill?”

“I can’t answer that.”

“The fact that she gets a gun. Does that tell you she had the capacity to form the intent to kill?”

“I don’t know.”

But Did She Know Right from Wrong?

“That she moved the body from the storage room to the Tiguan to the airport. Does that show that she had the capacity to know right from wrong?”

“I don’t feel qualified to conclude that. She certainly had the capacity to move it from one place to another, for one reason or another, and certainly seemed to be keeping it a secret of some sort…She knows she could be in great trouble if this is not hidden.”

“Did she have the capacity to wash away the incriminating evidence by washing the Tiguan?”

“Yes.”

“She goes back to the area in Palmer Lake where the body is. Is that evidence she knows right from wrong?”

“In my opinion, that’s evidence of stupidity.”

The Defense Gets Another Chance with Lewis

At the conclusion of Young’s 2 days of questions and videos of the interviews between Lewis and Stauch, and Stauch’s attorney, Josh Tolini, the defense has the opportunity to question Lewis again. Re-direct is kept short.

In regards to the EEG and the e-mail of Lewis telling defense to withdraw the request, Lewis explains “It was not something I was going to get hung up on at that point in time.”

Is there a rational explanation, other than a psychotic episode or any type of motive? Lewis is “unaware of any motive that makes sense.”

Before sitting down, Tolini gives Lewis the chance to sum up her thoughts. “What you call it,” Lewis says, “is so much less important than what you understand about it…signs, symptoms, behaviors…very odd relationships…I don’t care what you call it…the person is living a psychotic life.”

Who Benefited More?

Niederhouser’s testimony was straight forward and spoke of Stauch having no signs of severe or debilitating mental illness in the defendant and of the two days Lewis was on the stand, the majority of the evidence presented, and questions directed to her were from the state. Lewis seemed to get lost often and go into word salad. She is uncertain of many facts of the case, and unable to give solid answers to the state’s questions. Defense got in a few good questions, with decent answers. Was it enough? Did the testimony of the 2 doctors help the defense or the state?

To learn more about Colorado vs. Letecia Stauch:

Trial to Start for Letecia Stauch, Woman Charged with Killing Her Stepson

Father of Murdered Child Testifies

State’s Exhibit #35, The Phone Call

Internet Searches Give Jury A Look into Defendant’s State of Mind

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post The Defense’s Case, A Win for The State? appeared first on .

Letecia Stauch was arrested on March 2, 2020, charged with the murder of her Stepson, Gannon Stuach. On that day, a post-arrest interview was conducted by Special Agent Jonathan Grusing of the FBI. During this interview, Grusing spoke of internet searches made on Stauch’s Iphone.

The first of about a dozen searches Grusing read off gives us a look into the events of the day Gannon went missing. In conjunction with the blood spatter evidence, a search of “blood is spurting from an arterial bleed” paints a gruesome picture of what was going on in the bedroom of Gannon Stauch. A search for “how to get blood out of sheets” and “can I spray paint blood” were also found. To the search about blood on the sheets, Stauch replied to Grusing, “If I ever looked up blood out of sheets, it was because of nose bleed.”

There were serveral more searches read out loud by Grusing. Below are some of them:

            “I don’t like my stepson, should I get a divorce”

            “I want immunity because it was gang related”

            “Find me a new husband”

            “Find me a rich guy who wants to take care of his kids”

            “I’m doing all the work for my step kids and their mom isn’t helping me”

            “My husband wants a baby, but I want an abortion”

            “Stuff a suicidal person might say”

Stauch interrupts throughout the reading of the searches. The theme much the same throughout, she loved those kids; she was doing the work. “I wanted those kids to be saying to me that I’m their mom”, Stauch said to Grusing.

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Internet Searches Give Jury A Look into Defendant’s State of Mind appeared first on .

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. – One day 2 of the Letecia Stauch trial, the prosecution played an almost 2-hour audio of a phone call between the defendant and her now ex-husband, Al Stauch. This call was recorded before the body of Gannon Stauch was found, and in cooperation with investigators.

Throughout the audio, Letecia is talking all over the place.  She jumps around and backtracks. Al keeps calm and composed throughout the conversation. With the help of investigators, he is able to keep the conversation flowing, while letting Letecia say what it is she’s going to say. He occasionally steps in with questions he, and investigators, are trying to get answers to.

The Narrative, According to Letecia

The conversation starts with Letecia going over her narrative of the evening before Gannon went missing, Sunday, January 26, 2020. According to her, Gannon had a stomachache and struggled to have a bowel movement. He then took a bathe and went to bed. She went upstairs and out of nowhere the alarm goes off. She put the alarm code in but hears, “Fire. Fire. Fire.” Looking around, she doesn’t see a fire. After getting Laina, Gannon’s sister, and the dogs in the car, Letecia goes to the basement.

A frantic scene is described, and she is unable to give a clear time for when the incident took place. “Within fifteen minutes of the ADT alert,” she tells him when asked. Letecia and Gannon get upstairs and out of the house. “I’m running. He’s running behind me.” The get into the car, Gannon in the passenger seat.

“He’s beside me screaming, crying. Laina is in the backseat with the dog.” She drove around the block then went back to the house.  Laina is put in the parents’ bed and then she goes to take care of Gannon.

According to Letecia, Gannon had knocked over a candle he had lit to cover the “smell of poop”. He then knocked it over when he thought she was coming downstairs because he was playing his Nintendo Switch when he wasn’t supposed to be. In doing so, he burned his arm.

Letecia admits that she “should have looked closer at his arms.” She describes “bubbly spots” on both sides of Gannon’s arms but didn’t see anything that “thrown a flag that it was an emergency.”  She didn’t have any pain medication for him but did apply Aloe.

Gannon is panicked and scared of being grounded. She gives him water and tries to calm him down, telling him not to worry. Her narrative then goes back to the stomach issues. She tells Al that Gannon wanted to stay home from school the next day. He was “afraid of pooping in his pants.”

The Day Gannon Goes Missing

Gannon home from school on Monday, they went out to run errands. On the way out, she approached a guy in the neighborhood to fix the carpet. She gave him the garage code to let himself in. Gannon was with her, so She didn’t think there was a threat in doing. She only wanted to get the carpet fixed so “the boy” wouldn’t be so upset.

From there, they went to Petco where she got outfits for the 2 doges and planned to go to Play It Again Sports. They detoured to check out a bike she wanted to get to surprise Al with. After getting lost trying to find the house in the listing, they went back to Petco. They had to get back home for Laina and never made it to Play It Again Sports.

Gannon and Leticia got home between 2:30 and 2:45 p.m. Gannon goes straight downstairs to his room. She notices that the alarm was changed from “alarm away” to “alarm safe” but didn’t think much of it. She called ADT and they said it does that if there’s alarm in the house. Since there was no sensor on the garage door, she assumed it happened when the carpet guy let himself in.

Gannon asks to go play with a friend; he’ll be back later. Letecia goes upstairs with hopes to use her Peleton. She is getting ready when she hears a noise. She shouts for Gannon, nothing. There’s another loud noise and thought it was the carpet guy. She walks downstairs and sees a guy. The next thing [she] knows, [she’s] out.

“When I woke up there was no blood anywhere.” The details, according to Letecia, are a blur because of hitting her head but can remember “bits and pieces”. She hears Gannon speaking to the man, who Letecia theorizes may have already been in the house. She believes he may have possibly spent the night before inside the house.

Gannon is described as being “very calm”. She thinks to herself, “There’s a piece missing. Gannon knew something about something” and remembers Gannon saying he (Gannon) would be back later. Nowhere in the story given here did Letecia mention a rape as she does in other accounts of the events.

During this time, she sent Harley (Letecia’s daughter) to take Laina to the Dollar tree with a list of supplies to pick up. She then went back downstairs and tried to plead with the man, who had Gannon wrapped in his arms.

“Did You Kill Gannon?”

At this time, Letecia breaks from her narrative and questions Al. “Why do you act like you got me on some trial,” she asks him.

To that, Al asks, “Did you kill Gannon.” A back and forth between Al and Letecia transpires.

“The answer to that,” she responds, “is no. I can’t believe you asked me this.”

“This is the fourth story. I just don’t know what the hell is going on. I don’t believe you killed him but did something bad happen to him and you panicked?”

“If an accident happened, I know what to do. You go to the people and tell them it was an accident. I didn’t have anything to do with it.”

“None of this makes sense,” a frustrated Al says. “He would have been found by now.”

Turning the subject to herself, Letecia asks, “Why are you not with your wife and daughter?”

“Because of this conversation. I’m confused. Did Gannon die and you freaked out? Did you kill Gannon? Did Gannon die on your watch? Did Harley kill Gannon?”

To all the questions, Letecia responds, “No.”

“There’s a blank somewhere and you have not filled in the blank,” Al says. “These stories don’t sound legit to me. They just don’t add up.” That’s where the call ends.

This call took place approximately 3 weeks after Gannon disappeared.

Further Reading:

Trial to Start for Leticia Stauch, Woman Charged with Killing Her Stepson https://truthanddeliberation.com/2023/04/03/trial-to-start-for-leticia-stauch-woman-charged-with-killing-her-stepson/

Father of Murdered Child Testifies
https://truthanddeliberation.com/2023/04/05/father-of-murdered-child-testifies/

For More Trial Updates & Live Tweets, Follow On Social Media

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TruthandDeliberation/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TrthDelibration

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post State’s Exhibit #35, The Phone Call appeared first on .

Colorado Springs, Colo. – Eugene “Al” Stauch, father of murder victim Gannon Stauch, took the stand on Tuesday, April 5, opening the State’s case. Al was married to Leticia Stauch, the woman on trial for killing her stepson in January 2020.

The week before Gannon disappeared, Al’s mother was in town. That Saturday, January 25, 2020, Al, Gannon, and the family went out to dinner. When they got home, Gannon and his father were standing at the top of the stairs leading down to Gannon’s bedroom in the basement.  Al was getting ready to leave with his mom.  Al gave Gannon a hug and ran his hands through his hair, something he always did. He told Gannon that he loved him and “you’re always gonna be in my heart, and I’m always gonna be in your heart. I’ll see you when I get home.” “Okay, Daddy,” Gannon responded. “I love you. I’m gonna go finish watching Pokémon.”  That was the last time Al saw his son alive.

“When did you first learn something happened to [Gannon],” Prosecutor Michael Allen asks the father. Al, a soldier in the Army National Guard, was out of town at the time of the disappearance of his son. The defendant, Letecia Stauch, told him that Gannon had stayed home that day with stomach, something Al said was not ordinary. Al had back-and-forth conversations (through texts) with Letecia during which she told him about Gannon not coming home “yet” from a friend’s house. Gannon was late.

A Father’s Rush to Get Home

At this time, Al called numerous friends’ parent, none of them had seen Gannon. Letecia informed him that she had called 911, and that’s when he grew worried.  Al arranged to take an emergency flight home. A friend drove him to Oklahoma City and he flew out the next day on Tuesday, January 28, 2020.

Despite having a vehicle of her own, Letecia rented a vehicle at the airport to drive Al home in. Letecia told Al that she had one of her coworkers drive her to the airport after she parked her own vehicle at French Elementary School, where she worked at the time. She told Al that they would be doing a lot of driving around searching and she didn’t want to put mileage on her leased vehicle.  This seemed odd to Al since it’s not something one would think about during a time of an emergency.

The day Al returned home, January 28, he and Letecia went to a gas station after receiving a tip that Gannon had possibly been seen there. After watching footage of the boy alleged to possibly be Gannon, he realized it wasn’t him. He continued to drive around, searching different places for his son.

Meeting With Detectives

Al, Letecia with him, met for the first time with detectives at a Starbucks. At that time, he gave Gannon’s phone to detectives for them to process. Together, they worked through the story of Gannon going missing an what he (Al) had done as a result. Letecia’s story to the detectives centered around Gannon going to a friend’s house, and not coming home.

Later that day, Al would go for his first interview at the sheriff’s office. Letecia would not be with him this time. During this first interview, Al said he was vague about the details of his and Letecia’s relationship. At this point, he didn’t yet suspect her to be involved in the disappearance. After the interview, he went home to check on the girls before going back out looking for Gannon.

Things Don’t Add Up

During his search, Al decided to go to French Elementary School to look for Letecia’s vehicle. After driving around, 3 times, unable to locate the vehicle, he freaked out. This is when he first realized that she had lied to him. She had told him that she parked her car at the school, but never said anything about moving it. At this moment, he began to question Gannon’s disappearance.

After not locating Letecia’s vehicle, Al called Detective Bethel who told him to return to the sheriff’s office. That’s when he had his second interview with detectives. When asked what he thought he was going to find if he found the car, he responded “My hope was to find Gannon. That was the whole point of search, to find Gannon.”

The next day, Wednesday, January 29, Al was sleeping on the couch when he received a text from Letecia who was in their bedroom. She asked him to come the bedroom and talk to her. This is the first time he would hear the rape story. Letecia told Al that on the day Gannon disappeared, she was raped and beat up; Gannon had also been beat up and taken. The attack happened in Gannon’s bedroom, and she had cleaned up the mess. According to Al, Letecia’s demeanor while telling the story was frantic and all over the place, but she did not cry.

Al thought to himself that this story was “bullshit.” He asked her to stay in the room and he would be right back.  His mother and siter had slept in Gannon’s room the night before. He told them they had to get their stuff and get out of the bedroom because it may be a crime scene. He then notified authorities.

Letecia Moves Out

Letecia moved out of the house the same week Gannon disappeared. On January 31, after several call and texts, Letecia came back to the house with her daughter, mother, and brother. Al, Landon (Gannon’s mother), Al’s brother, sister, a daughter, and a deputy were already at the house. The only time Al would be in the same room as Letecia he had the deputy with him.  Letecia gathered her things. Al never saw the green suitcase (in which Gannon’s body was later found) leave the house.

After this day, Al would not see his estranged wife again until he saw her in the courtroom. The only communications between them would be through text, e-mail, and phone calls. Her story of what happened the day Gannon disappeared would change several times, involving different people including men named “Eguardo” and “Quincy Brown”.

Further Reading

To read more about this story and the trial of Letecia Stauch, https://truthanddeliberation.com/2023/04/03/trial-to-start-for-leticia-stauch-woman-charged-with-killing-her-stepson/

About Post Author

jphiggs

joe@make-n-mod.com

https://truthanddeliberation.com

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Father of Murdered Child Testifies appeared first on .